reservation: exist in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.63
, order
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rosebud
Weight: 0.45
, escort service
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, service station
Weight: 0.33
, postal service
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
exist in india 1.00
be in india 0.93
be important in india 0.92
be necessary in india 0.91
is canada 0.82
exist 0.81
is poor canada 0.80
be set up in america 0.76
were set up in america 0.75
be in present-day oklahoma 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(order, exist)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(reservation, exist in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(order, exist)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(order, exist)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(order, exist)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(reservation, exist in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(reservation, exist in india)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(reservation, exist)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(reservation, exist)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(reservation, be in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(reservation, be in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(reservation, be in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(reservation, is poor canada)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(reservation, is canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(reservation, is canada)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(reservation, were set up in america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(reservation, is canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(reservation, is canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(reservation, exist)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reservation, be important in india)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(reservation, be set up in america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(reservation, be set up in america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(reservation, be set up in america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(reservation, is poor canada)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(reservation, were set up in america)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be important in india)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be set up in america)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(reservation, is poor canada)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(reservation, is poor canada)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reservation, be important in india)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(reservation, were set up in america)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be in present-day oklahoma)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(reservation, be in present-day oklahoma)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(reservation, be important in india)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(reservation, were set up in america)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(reservation, be in present-day oklahoma)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(reservation, be in present-day oklahoma)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(reservation, exist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(reservation, exist in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(order, exist)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(reservation, exist in india)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(order, exist)