reservation: is poor canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.63
, order
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rosebud
Weight: 0.45
, escort service
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, service station
Weight: 0.33
, postal service
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor canada 1.00
is canada 0.93
be in india 0.81
be important in india 0.80
is poor 0.80
exist in india 0.80
be necessary in india 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(reservation, is poor canada)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(reservation, is canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(reservation, is canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(reservation, is canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(reservation, is canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(reservation, exist in india)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(reservation, be in india)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(reservation, is poor)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reservation, be important in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(reservation, exist in india)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(reservation, be in india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be in india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(reservation, exist in india)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(reservation, be in india)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(reservation, is poor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(reservation, exist in india)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(reservation, is poor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(reservation, is poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reservation, be important in india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be necessary in india)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(reservation, be important in india)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(reservation, be important in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(reservation, is poor canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(reservation, is poor canada)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(reservation, is poor canada)