resident: has physical part rights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.61
, community
Weight: 0.61
, user
Weight: 0.56
, employee
Weight: 0.55
Siblings elderly person
Weight: 0.64
, naturalist
Weight: 0.55
, businessman
Weight: 0.55
, settler
Weight: 0.54
, gardener
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part rights 1.00
have important rights 0.91
have limited voting rights 0.82
have voting rights 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(resident, has physical part rights)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(resident, have important rights)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(resident, have limited voting rights)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resident, have voting rights)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(resident, have limited voting rights)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(resident, have voting rights)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(resident, have important rights)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(resident, have voting rights)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(resident, have limited voting rights)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(resident, have voting rights)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(resident, have important rights)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resident, have limited voting rights)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(resident, have important rights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(resident, has physical part rights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(resident, has physical part rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(resident, has physical part rights)