resistance: be analogous to mechanical friction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents barrier
Weight: 0.68
, force
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, trait
Weight: 0.59
Siblings electrical resistance
Weight: 0.35
, blood brain barrier
Weight: 0.33
, mountain range
Weight: 0.32
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.32
, wall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be analogous to mechanical friction 1.00
be related to inertia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(force, be related to inertia)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(force, be related to inertia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(force, be related to inertia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electrical resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(force, be related to inertia)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(electrical resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(electrical resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(force, be related to inertia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(electrical resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(resistance, be analogous to mechanical friction)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(force, be related to inertia)