# resistance: be example by natural selection

from Quasimodo

## Related concepts

 Parents barrierWeight: 0.68, forceWeight: 0.59, factorWeight: 0.59, traitWeight: 0.59 Siblings electrical resistanceWeight: 0.35, blood brain barrierWeight: 0.33, mountain rangeWeight: 0.32, tensile strengthWeight: 0.32, wallWeight: 0.32

## Related properties

 Similarity Property be example by natural selection 1.00 be example of natural selection 0.99 be explained by natural selection 0.91 exemplify process by natural selection 0.87 be observed in light of darwinian selection theory 0.80 be example of evolution 0.78

## Clauses

### Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(resistance, be example by natural selection)

### Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(resistance, be example of evolution)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(resistance, be example of evolution)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(resistance, be example of evolution)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be example of evolution)

### Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be example by natural selection)

### Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(resistance, be example by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(resistance, be example by natural selection)