resistance: be explained by natural selection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents barrier
Weight: 0.68
, force
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, trait
Weight: 0.59
Siblings electrical resistance
Weight: 0.35
, blood brain barrier
Weight: 0.33
, mountain range
Weight: 0.32
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.32
, wall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be explained by natural selection 1.00
be example by natural selection 0.91
be example of natural selection 0.89
exemplify process by natural selection 0.85
be observed in light of darwinian selection theory 0.81
be acted upon by selections 0.76
be acted by selections 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(resistance, be explained by natural selection)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be example by natural selection)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(resistance, be example by natural selection)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(resistance, be example by natural selection)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(resistance, be example by natural selection)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be explained by natural selection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(resistance, be explained by natural selection)