resistance: be inversely proportional to area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents barrier
Weight: 0.68
, force
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, trait
Weight: 0.59
Siblings electrical resistance
Weight: 0.35
, blood brain barrier
Weight: 0.33
, mountain range
Weight: 0.32
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.32
, wall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be inversely proportional to area 1.00
be inversely proportional to current 0.97
is directly proportional 0.84
be directly proportional to length 0.82
be proportional to length 0.82
be directly proportional to voltage 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(resistance, be proportional to length)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(resistance, be proportional to length)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be proportional to length)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be directly proportional to voltage)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(resistance, be directly proportional to voltage)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(resistance, be directly proportional to voltage)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(resistance, be proportional to length)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(resistance, be directly proportional to voltage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(resistance, be inversely proportional to area)