resistance: be observed in light of darwinian selection theory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents barrier
Weight: 0.68
, force
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, trait
Weight: 0.59
Siblings electrical resistance
Weight: 0.35
, blood brain barrier
Weight: 0.33
, mountain range
Weight: 0.32
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.32
, wall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be observed in light of darwinian selection theory 1.00
be explained by natural selection 0.81
be example by natural selection 0.80
be example of natural selection 0.79
be observed in males 0.76
exemplify process by natural selection 0.76
be observed in more males 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(trait, be observed in more males)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(trait, be observed in more males)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(trait, be observed in more males)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(trait, be observed in more males)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be example by natural selection)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(resistance, be example by natural selection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(resistance, be example by natural selection)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(resistance, exemplify process by natural selection)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(resistance, be explained by natural selection)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(resistance, be example of natural selection)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(resistance, be example by natural selection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(trait, be observed in more males)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(resistance, be observed in light of darwinian selection theory)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(trait, be observed in more males)