resistance: decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents barrier
Weight: 0.68
, force
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, trait
Weight: 0.59
Siblings electrical resistance
Weight: 0.35
, blood brain barrier
Weight: 0.33
, mountain range
Weight: 0.32
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.32
, wall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor 1.00
decrease with increase in electrolytic conductor 0.98
decrease with increase in temperature in conductor 0.93
decrease with increase in conductor 0.89
decrease with increase in temperature 0.88
decrease with temperature 0.88
increase with temperature 0.86
increases with increase in temperature 0.85
increases with temperature 0.84
decrease with increase 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in electrolytic conductor)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in conductor)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in conductor)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in temperature)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with temperature)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with increase)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in conductor)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in conductor)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in conductor)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in conductor)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with temperature)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(electrical resistance, decrease with temperature)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in temperature)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in temperature)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with increase)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(electrical resistance, decrease with increase)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in electrolytic conductor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(resistance, increase with temperature)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(resistance, decrease with temperature)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(resistance, increase with temperature)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(resistance, increase with temperature)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(resistance, increases with temperature)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(resistance, decrease with temperature)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(resistance, increases with temperature)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(resistance, decrease with temperature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(resistance, increase with temperature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(resistance, increases with temperature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with temperature)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(resistance, increases with temperature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in conductor)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(electrical resistance, decrease with temperature)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in conductor)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in temperature)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(electrical resistance, decrease with increase in electrolytic conductor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(resistance, decrease with increase in temperature in electrolytic conductor)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(electrical resistance, decrease with increase)