resolution: be dependent on wavelength of light

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.69
, agreement
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.67
, provision
Weight: 0.65
Siblings council
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, end
Weight: 0.61
, amendment
Weight: 0.36
, bill
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dependent on wavelength of light 1.00
be dependent on wavelength 0.98
be limited by wavelength 0.91
CAN can achieved with optical microscope using 0.75
CAN can achieved with optical microscope 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be dependent on wavelength)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(resolution, be limited by wavelength)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be limited by wavelength)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(resolution, be dependent on wavelength)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(resolution, be dependent on wavelength)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(resolution, be dependent on wavelength)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(resolution, be limited by wavelength)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(resolution, be limited by wavelength)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(resolution, be dependent on wavelength of light)