resolution: be more important at magnifications

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.69
, agreement
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.67
, provision
Weight: 0.65
Siblings council
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, end
Weight: 0.61
, amendment
Weight: 0.36
, bill
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important at magnifications 1.00
be more important at higher magnifications 0.98
be more important than magnification 0.88
be different from magnification 0.85
limit factor to magnification 0.80
be more important than ppi for displays 0.79
be more important than ppi 0.77
CAN can achieved with optical microscope 0.77
CAN can achieved with optical microscope using 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(resolution, be more important at magnifications)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important at higher magnifications)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be more important at higher magnifications)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(resolution, be more important at higher magnifications)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(resolution, limit factor to magnification)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important than ppi for displays)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(resolution, limit factor to magnification)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be more important than ppi for displays)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important than ppi)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(resolution, be more important at higher magnifications)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be more important than ppi)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(resolution, limit factor to magnification)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(resolution, be more important than ppi for displays)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(resolution, limit factor to magnification)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(resolution, be more important than ppi for displays)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(resolution, be more important than ppi)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(resolution, be more important than ppi)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be more important at magnifications)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important at magnifications)