resolution: be more important than magnification

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.69
, agreement
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.67
, provision
Weight: 0.65
Siblings council
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, end
Weight: 0.61
, amendment
Weight: 0.36
, bill
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important than magnification 1.00
be different from magnification 0.96
limit factor to magnification 0.91
be more important at magnifications 0.88
be more important at higher magnifications 0.87
CAN can achieved with optical microscope 0.79
CAN can achieved with optical microscope using 0.79
be more important than ppi for displays 0.77
be more important than ppi 0.76
CAN can achieved with microscope 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(resolution, limit factor to magnification)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(resolution, limit factor to magnification)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important at higher magnifications)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be more important at higher magnifications)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(resolution, be more important at higher magnifications)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important than ppi for displays)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be more important than ppi for displays)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important than ppi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be more important than ppi)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(resolution, be different from magnification)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(resolution, limit factor to magnification)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(resolution, be more important at higher magnifications)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(resolution, limit factor to magnification)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(resolution, be more important at magnifications)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(resolution, be more important than ppi for displays)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(resolution, be more important than ppi for displays)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with optical microscope using)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(resolution, be more important than ppi)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(resolution, be more important than ppi)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(resolution, CAN can achieved with microscope)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(resolution, be more important than magnification)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(resolution, be more important than magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(resolution, be more important than magnification)