resource: be allocated in england

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
, document
Weight: 0.59
, barrier
Weight: 0.58
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.68
, solar energy
Weight: 0.67
, coral reef
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allocated in england 1.00
be allocated in usa 0.91
be allocated in australia 0.89
be allocated in jamaica 0.88
be allocated 0.87
be allocated in game 0.85
be allocated in economy 0.82
be allocated under compitative market machanism 0.82
be allocated under market machanism 0.82
be allocated under economy 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in england)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in jamaica)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated in jamaica)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in jamaica)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated in economy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated in economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in jamaica)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated under compitative market machanism)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(resource, be allocated in england)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(resource, be allocated in england)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(resource, be allocated in england)