resource: be considered best resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
, document
Weight: 0.59
, barrier
Weight: 0.58
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.68
, solar energy
Weight: 0.67
, coral reef
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered best resource 1.00
be considered as best resource 0.99
be considered as resource 0.95
be considered resource 0.95
is most important resource 0.91
is important resource 0.90
is most valuable resource 0.90
is valuable resource 0.88
has quality resource 0.87
is central resource 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be considered resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be considered resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(resource, be considered best resource)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(resource, be considered resource)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(resource, be considered as best resource)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(resource, be considered resource)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(resource, be considered as best resource)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(resource, be considered as best resource)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(resource, has quality resource)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(resource, is central resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered as best resource)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(resource, is central resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(resource, is central resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(resource, is central resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(resource, be considered best resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(solar energy, be considered resource)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)