resource: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
, document
Weight: 0.59
, barrier
Weight: 0.58
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.68
, solar energy
Weight: 0.67
, coral reef
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be related to life 0.89
be related to human life 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mineral, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mineral, be related)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mineral, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(resource, be related)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(resource, be related to life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(resource, be related to life)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(resource, be related to life)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resource, be related to life)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(resource, be related to human life)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(resource, be related to human life)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(resource, be related to human life)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resource, be related to human life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(resource, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(resource, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(resource, be related)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mineral, be related)