restaurant bill: be at table

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tip
Weight: 0.53
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at table 1.00
be at your table 0.94
wants to wait table 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(tip, wants to wait table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(restaurant bill, be at table)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(tip, wants to wait table)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tip, wants to wait table)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(tip, wants to wait table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(restaurant bill, be at table)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(restaurant bill, be at table)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(restaurant bill, be at your table)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(restaurant bill, be at your table)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant bill, be at your table)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(restaurant bill, be at your table)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant bill, be at table)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(restaurant bill, be at table)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(tip, wants to wait table)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(restaurant bill, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(tip, wants to wait table)