restaurant bill: be called checks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tip
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tos
Weight: 0.18

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called checks 1.00
be called check 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(restaurant bill, be called checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(restaurant bill, be called checks)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(restaurant bill, be called checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(restaurant bill, be called check)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(restaurant bill, be called checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(restaurant bill, be called check)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(restaurant bill, be called checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(restaurant bill, be called check)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(restaurant bill, be called checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(restaurant bill, be called check)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(restaurant bill, be called checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(restaurant bill, be called checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(restaurant bill, be called checks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(restaurant bill, be called checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(restaurant bill, be called checks)