restaurant diner: be at nice part of town

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at nice part of town 1.00
be at town 0.86
be at small town 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(restaurant diner, be at small town)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(restaurant diner, be at small town)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(restaurant diner, be at small town)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(restaurant diner, be at town)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(restaurant diner, be at town)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(restaurant diner, be at town)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant diner, be at town)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(restaurant diner, be at small town)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(restaurant diner, be at nice part of town)