restaurant diner: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at restaurant 1.00
be at diner 0.87
be more casual than restaurant 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(restaurant diner, be at diner)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(restaurant diner, be more casual than restaurant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(restaurant diner, be at diner)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant diner, be at diner)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(restaurant diner, be more casual than restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(restaurant diner, be more casual than restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(restaurant diner, be at diner)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant diner, be more casual than restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(restaurant diner, be at restaurant)