restaurant: be consider to be public place

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, institution
Weight: 0.64
, accommodation
Weight: 0.64
, food store
Weight: 0.62
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
be consider to be public place 1.00
be used to place to work 0.77
be one kind of eat place 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be consider to be public place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to place to work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(restaurant, be consider to be public place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to place to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be used to place to work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(restaurant, be consider to be public place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(restaurant, be consider to be public place)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(restaurant, be consider to be public place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be one kind of eat place)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(restaurant, be consider to be public place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(restaurant, be one kind of eat place)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(restaurant, be consider to be public place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be one kind of eat place)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(restaurant, be consider to be public place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be one kind of eat place)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(restaurant, be consider to be public place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(restaurant, be consider to be public place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be consider to be public place)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(restaurant, be consider to be public place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(restaurant, be consider to be public place)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be consider to be public place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to place to work)