restaurant: be much more expensive in nyc

Related concepts

Parents	food chain Weight: 0.69 , grocery store Weight: 0.68 , food store Weight: 0.67 , institution Weight: 0.64
Siblings	italian restaurant Weight: 0.87 , seafood restaurant Weight: 0.81 , steakhouse Weight: 0.80 , fast food restaurant Weight: 0.80 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be much more expensive in nyc	1.00
is nyc	0.89
is more expensive	0.82
be in iceland expensive	0.81
be cheap in toronto	0.81
be expensive in norway	0.79
is expensive	0.78
dallas tx	0.76
leave seattle	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(grocery store, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(grocery store, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(food store, dallas tx) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(food store, dallas tx)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(grocery store, is more expensive)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(grocery store, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(food store, dallas tx)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(grocery store, is more expensive)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(grocery store, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, leave seattle)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(grocery store, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(grocery store, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(food store, dallas tx) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

Remarkable(steakhouse, leave seattle) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(steakhouse, leave seattle)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(steakhouse, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(steakhouse, is expensive)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(italian restaurant, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(restaurant, is nyc)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(restaurant, is nyc)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is nyc)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(restaurant, is nyc)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(restaurant, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Salient(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(grocery store, is more expensive)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(grocery store, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(steakhouse, leave seattle)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(italian restaurant, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(steakhouse, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(grocery store, is more expensive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(grocery store, is expensive)