restaurant: be popular in usa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.69
, grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, food store
Weight: 0.67
, institution
Weight: 0.64
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in usa 1.00
work in canada 0.80
be expensive in norway 0.80
close in uk 0.78
dallas tx 0.77
is japan 0.77
be in mexico city 0.77
be cheap in toronto 0.76
is japanese 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(food chain, is japanese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food chain, is japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(grocery store, work in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(food store, dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(grocery store, work in canada)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(food store, dallas tx)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(food chain, is japan)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(food chain, is japanese)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, work in canada)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(food store, dallas tx)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is japan)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is japanese)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(food chain, is japanese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food chain, is japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(grocery store, work in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(food store, dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(restaurant, be popular in usa)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(restaurant, close in uk)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(restaurant, close in uk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(restaurant, close in uk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be cheap in toronto)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, close in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(grocery store, work in canada)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(food chain, is japan)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(food chain, is japanese)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be cheap in toronto)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(grocery store, work in canada)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(food store, dallas tx)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(food chain, is japan)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(restaurant, be popular in usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(food chain, is japanese)