restaurant: has menu

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, institution
Weight: 0.64
, accommodation
Weight: 0.64
, food store
Weight: 0.62
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
has menu 1.00
has paper menu 0.96
has pasta dish on menu 0.90
be at restaurant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(restaurant, has menu)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(restaurant, has paper menu)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(restaurant, has paper menu)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has paper menu)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(restaurant, has paper menu)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has menu)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(restaurant, has menu)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, has menu)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)