restaurant: have lighting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.69
, grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, food store
Weight: 0.67
, institution
Weight: 0.64
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
have lighting 1.00
have low lighting 0.95
have dim lighting 0.92
have lights 0.85
have black lights 0.80
dim lights 0.79
have blue lights 0.79
keep lights in bathroom 0.78
have uv lights 0.77
leave on lights 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(restaurant, have lighting)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have dim lighting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(restaurant, have dim lighting)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have black lights)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(restaurant, have dim lighting)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(restaurant, have black lights)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(restaurant, have dim lighting)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(restaurant, have black lights)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, have black lights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, have lighting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(restaurant, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(restaurant, have lighting)