restaurant: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.69
, grocery store
Weight: 0.68
, food store
Weight: 0.67
, institution
Weight: 0.64
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.87
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.80
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
is cheaper 0.85
be in iceland expensive 0.83
is cheap 0.79
be expensive in norway 0.78
be much more expensive in nyc 0.78
is inefficient 0.76
is more efficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(grocery store, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(grocery store, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(institution, is inefficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(grocery store, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(grocery store, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(institution, is inefficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(food chain, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, is more expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, is cheaper)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(institution, is inefficient)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(grocery store, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(grocery store, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(institution, is inefficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(food chain, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(steakhouse, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(italian restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(restaurant, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be much more expensive in nyc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(grocery store, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(food chain, is more efficient)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(grocery store, is more expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(institution, is inefficient)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grocery store, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(steakhouse, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(grocery store, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(grocery store, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grocery store, is cheaper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(institution, is inefficient)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(restaurant, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(food chain, is more efficient)