restoration: is better then puritanism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.69
, process
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, building
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dentures
Weight: 0.51
, construction
Weight: 0.34
, rehabilitation
Weight: 0.34
, landscaping
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is better then puritanism 1.00
is better puritanism 0.99
is then puritanism 0.99
is puritanism 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(restoration, is better then puritanism)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(restoration, is better puritanism)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(restoration, is then puritanism)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(restoration, is puritanism)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(restoration, is then puritanism)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(restoration, is better puritanism)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(restoration, is puritanism)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(restoration, is then puritanism)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(restoration, is better puritanism)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(restoration, is puritanism)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(restoration, is then puritanism)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(restoration, is puritanism)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(restoration, is better puritanism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(restoration, is better then puritanism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(restoration, is better then puritanism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(restoration, is better then puritanism)