retriever: be in need

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, work
Weight: 0.42
, water
Weight: 0.37
, animal
Weight: 0.34
Siblings golden retriever
Weight: 0.78
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in need 1.00
need cold home 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, need cold home)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, be in need)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(golden retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, be in need)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(golden retriever, need cold home) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, need cold home)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(retriever, be in need)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(retriever, need cold home)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(retriever, need cold home)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(retriever, need cold home)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(retriever, need cold home)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be in need)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(retriever, be in need)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(golden retriever, be in need)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be in need) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(golden retriever, need cold home)