retriever: be more prone to cancer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, work
Weight: 0.42
, water
Weight: 0.37
, animal
Weight: 0.34
Siblings golden retriever
Weight: 0.78
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more prone to cancer 1.00
be prone to cancer 0.98
get cancer 0.83
die of cancer 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, get cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, be more prone to cancer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, get cancer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, get cancer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, die of cancer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, be more prone to cancer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, be prone to cancer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, get cancer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, get cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(retriever, be more prone to cancer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(golden retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, be more prone to cancer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(golden retriever, be prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, be prone to cancer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(golden retriever, die of cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, die of cancer)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(golden retriever, get cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, get cancer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(retriever, be more prone to cancer)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, be prone to cancer)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(retriever, be prone to cancer)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(retriever, be prone to cancer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(retriever, get cancer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(retriever, die of cancer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(retriever, die of cancer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(retriever, die of cancer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(retriever, get cancer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(retriever, get cancer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(retriever, die of cancer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be prone to cancer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(retriever, get cancer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, be more prone to cancer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, get cancer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(golden retriever, die of cancer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(golden retriever, be more prone to cancer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(golden retriever, be prone to cancer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(golden retriever, get cancer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, be more prone to cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, get cancer)