retriever: die young

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, work
Weight: 0.42
, water
Weight: 0.37
, animal
Weight: 0.34
Siblings golden retriever
Weight: 0.78
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
die young 1.00
die of cancer 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, die young)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, die young)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, die of cancer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, die young)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, die young)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(golden retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, die young)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(golden retriever, die of cancer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, die of cancer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(retriever, die young)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(retriever, die of cancer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(retriever, die of cancer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(retriever, die of cancer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(retriever, die of cancer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(retriever, die young)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(retriever, die young)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, die young)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(golden retriever, die young)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(retriever, die young)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(golden retriever, die of cancer)