retriever: has state pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, breed
Weight: 0.63
, work
Weight: 0.42
, water
Weight: 0.37
, animal
Weight: 0.34
Siblings golden retriever
Weight: 0.78
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pet 1.00
is good pet 0.94
has state pets 0.91
is dog 0.83
is good pets 0.83
make pets 0.83
be with cats 0.82
make good pets 0.81
is family dogs 0.80
is best dog 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, has state pet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, has state pet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, has state pet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, has state pet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make pets)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beagle, make pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is good pet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, has state pet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is good pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, make good pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is best dog)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, make pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is dog)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is dog)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(retriever, has state pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(golden retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, has state pet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(golden retriever, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is good pet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, is good pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(golden retriever, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, has state pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dachshund, has state pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(golden retriever, is dog)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is dog)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(dachshund, is dog)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is dog)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(golden retriever, make pets)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, make pets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(golden retriever, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is good pets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(beagle, make pets)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(beagle, make pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is good pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(golden retriever, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, make good pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(beagle, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(beagle, make good pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(golden retriever, is best dog)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is best dog)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, has state pet)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, is good pet)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, is good pet)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(retriever, has state pets)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, has state pets)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(retriever, is good pet)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(retriever, has state pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(retriever, is dog)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(retriever, is dog)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, is good pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(retriever, make pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(retriever, is dog)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, is good pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(retriever, make pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, make good pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, make good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(retriever, make pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(retriever, is good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, is best dog)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, is best dog)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(retriever, make good pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(retriever, is best dog)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(retriever, make good pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(retriever, make pets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is best dog)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is dog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, has state pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(dachshund, is dog)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is dog)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(golden retriever, make pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(golden retriever, has state pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(golden retriever, has state pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(beagle, make pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is good pet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is best dog)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dachshund, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(golden retriever, make good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, make good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, has state pet)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)