retriever: is good hunting dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, breed
Weight: 0.63
, work
Weight: 0.42
, water
Weight: 0.37
, animal
Weight: 0.34
Siblings golden retriever
Weight: 0.78
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good hunting dogs 1.00
is hunting dogs 0.98
is good dogs 0.88
is dogs 0.85
is good family dogs 0.84
is best dogs 0.83
is family dogs 0.81
is dog 0.81
is good pets 0.81
is best dog 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, is good hunting dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is good hunting dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is good family dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is hunting dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is hunting dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is good pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is best dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is good dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is best dog)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is dog)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, is dog)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(golden retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is good hunting dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(beagle, is hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(beagle, is hunting dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is hunting dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(golden retriever, is good dogs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is good dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(beagle, is good dogs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(labrador retriever, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(golden retriever, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beagle, is dogs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(golden retriever, is good family dogs)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is good family dogs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(golden retriever, is best dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is best dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(golden retriever, is dog)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is dog)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(dachshund, is dog)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is dog)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(golden retriever, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is good pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is good pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(golden retriever, is best dog)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, is best dog)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, is good hunting dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, is good dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(retriever, is good dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(retriever, is dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(retriever, is dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(retriever, is good dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(retriever, is good family dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(retriever, is dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, is good family dogs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(retriever, is best dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, is best dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(retriever, is dog)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(retriever, is dog)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, is good pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(retriever, is good family dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(retriever, is dog)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(retriever, is good pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(retriever, is best dog)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, is best dog)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(retriever, is best dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(retriever, is good pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(retriever, is best dog)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good family dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is best dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is best dog)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is dogs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is dog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(retriever, is good hunting dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(beagle, is hunting dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(dachshund, is dog)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is dog)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is hunting dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is good dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, is good hunting dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is best dog)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is good hunting dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is good hunting dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is best dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(labrador retriever, is good dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, is good dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golden retriever, is good family dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(retriever, is good hunting dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)