revenue: be credited in accounting

Related concepts

Parents	business activity Weight: 0.67 , value Weight: 0.66 , sale Weight: 0.61 , factor Weight: 0.58 , variable Weight: 0.57
Siblings	capital Weight: 0.59 , profit Weight: 0.35 , income Weight: 0.35 , advertising Weight: 0.34 , investment Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be credited in accounting	1.00
be credited	0.90
is credited	0.90
be negative in accounting	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(sale, is credited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(revenue, be credited in accounting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(sale, is credited)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(sale, is credited)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(income, be negative in accounting)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(capital, is credited)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(income, is credited)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(profit, is credited)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(sale, is credited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(profit, is credited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(profit, is credited)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(income, is credited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(income, is credited)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(capital, is credited) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(capital, is credited)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(income, be negative in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(income, be negative in accounting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(revenue, be credited in accounting)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(revenue, is credited)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(revenue, be credited)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(revenue, be credited)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(revenue, be credited)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(revenue, is credited)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(revenue, is credited)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be negative in accounting)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(revenue, is credited)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(revenue, be negative in accounting)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(revenue, be negative in accounting)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(revenue, be negative in accounting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(revenue, be credited in accounting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(sale, is credited)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(profit, is credited)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(capital, is credited)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(income, is credited)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(income, be negative in accounting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(sale, is credited)