revenue: be from stock investing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.67
, value
Weight: 0.66
, sale
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings capital
Weight: 0.59
, profit
Weight: 0.35
, income
Weight: 0.35
, advertising
Weight: 0.34
, investment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from stock investing 1.00
be from stock investing taxed 0.93
be important to investors 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(income, be important to investors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(income, be important to investors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(income, be important to investors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(revenue, be from stock investing)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be from stock investing taxed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(revenue, be from stock investing taxed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to investors)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(revenue, be from stock investing taxed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(revenue, be important to investors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to investors)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to investors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(revenue, be from stock investing taxed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be from stock investing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(revenue, be from stock investing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be from stock investing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(income, be important to investors)