revenue: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.67
, value
Weight: 0.66
, sale
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings capital
Weight: 0.59
, profit
Weight: 0.35
, income
Weight: 0.35
, advertising
Weight: 0.34
, investment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
be important in business 0.99
is as important 0.80
is just important 0.79
is just as important 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sale, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sale, be important to business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(value, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(value, be important in business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sale, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(capital, be important to business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(advertising, be important to business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(investment, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sale, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(investment, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(investment, be important to business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(profit, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(profit, be important to business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(advertising, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(advertising, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(capital, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(capital, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(revenue, be important to business)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(revenue, be important in business)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important in business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(revenue, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sale, be important to business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(investment, be important to business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(profit, be important to business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(capital, be important to business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(advertising, be important to business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sale, be important to business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in business)