revenue: be more important than profit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business activity
Weight: 0.67
, value
Weight: 0.66
, sale
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings capital
Weight: 0.59
, profit
Weight: 0.35
, income
Weight: 0.35
, advertising
Weight: 0.34
, investment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important than profit 1.00
be touted rather than profits 0.80
be less than demand 0.79
be less than price 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(revenue, be more important than profit)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(revenue, be less than demand)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(revenue, be less than demand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(revenue, be less than price)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(revenue, be less than price)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be less than demand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be less than price)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(revenue, be less than price)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(revenue, be less than demand)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(revenue, be touted rather than profits)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(revenue, be touted rather than profits)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(revenue, be touted rather than profits)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be touted rather than profits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be more important than profit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(revenue, be more important than profit)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(revenue, be more important than profit)