rhetoric: be important in society

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, art
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings politics
Weight: 0.34
, hyperbole
Weight: 0.33
, ideology
Weight: 0.33
, agenda
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in society 1.00
be important in democratic society 0.91
be important in politics 0.80
be important in literature 0.77
be important today 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ideology, be important in society)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ideology, be important in politics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(ideology, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ideology, be important in society)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ideology, be important in politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ideology, be important in politics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(rhetoric, be important in society)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in democratic society)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(rhetoric, be important in democratic society)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in politics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in literature)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be important today)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, be important in democratic society)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rhetoric, be important in politics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rhetoric, be important in literature)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(rhetoric, be important today)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be important in democratic society)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, be important today)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, be important in politics)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be important today)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, be important in literature)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be important in politics)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be important in literature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in society)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be important in society)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(ideology, be important in society)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be important in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ideology, be important in politics)