rhino: survive in wild

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, endangered species
Weight: 0.59
Siblings elephant
Weight: 0.39
, rhinoceros
Weight: 0.38
, tiger
Weight: 0.38
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38
, cheetah
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive in wild 1.00
survive 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, survive in wild)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tiger, survive in wild)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, survive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(tiger, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tiger, survive in wild)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cheetah, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cheetah, survive in wild)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cheetah, survive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cheetah, survive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(rhino, survive in wild)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rhino, survive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(rhino, survive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rhino, survive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rhino, survive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rhino, survive in wild)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rhino, survive in wild)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cheetah, survive in wild)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tiger, survive in wild)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rhino, survive in wild)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cheetah, survive)