rhombus: have diagonals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shape
Weight: 0.52
, polygon
Weight: 0.42
, parallelogram
Weight: 0.40
, figure
Weight: 0.38
, square
Weight: 0.37
Siblings hexagon
Weight: 0.33
, trapezoid
Weight: 0.32
, cone
Weight: 0.31
, hourglass
Weight: 0.31
, cube
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have diagonals 1.00
have 9 diagonals 0.96
have perpendicular diagonals 0.92
be different from rectangles 0.78
has shape rectangles 0.77
is geometric 0.76
be related to rectangles 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(parallelogram, be different from rectangles)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(parallelogram, has shape rectangles)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(square, be related to rectangles)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(parallelogram, is geometric)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(square, has shape rectangles)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(square, has shape rectangles)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(parallelogram, is geometric)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(parallelogram, has shape rectangles)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(square, be related to rectangles)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(parallelogram, be different from rectangles)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(square, has shape rectangles)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(square, be related to rectangles)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(parallelogram, be different from rectangles)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(parallelogram, has shape rectangles)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(parallelogram, is geometric)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hexagon, have 9 diagonals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(parallelogram, be different from rectangles)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(parallelogram, has shape rectangles)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(square, be related to rectangles)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(square, has shape rectangles)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(parallelogram, is geometric)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hexagon, have 9 diagonals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(hexagon, have 9 diagonals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(rhombus, have diagonals)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have perpendicular diagonals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(rhombus, have perpendicular diagonals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rhombus, have perpendicular diagonals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rhombus, have perpendicular diagonals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, has shape rectangles)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rhombus, has shape rectangles)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rhombus, has shape rectangles)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(rhombus, has shape rectangles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(parallelogram, is geometric)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(square, has shape rectangles)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(parallelogram, has shape rectangles)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(parallelogram, be different from rectangles)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(square, be related to rectangles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hexagon, have 9 diagonals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(parallelogram, is geometric)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(square, has shape rectangles)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(parallelogram, has shape rectangles)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(parallelogram, be different from rectangles)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(rhombus, have diagonals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(square, be related to rectangles)