:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(leg, pain)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(forearm, pain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(leg, ache)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(leg, pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(leg, pain)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(leg, ache)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(leg, ache)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rib, pain)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(rib, pain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(rib, pain)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rib, ache)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(rib, ache)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(rib, ache)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rib, pain)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rib, ache)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(forearm, pain)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(leg, pain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rib, has state pain)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(leg, ache)