richmond: was chosen as capital

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.63
, city
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.59
, suburb
Weight: 0.56
Siblings springfield
Weight: 0.35
, sheffield
Weight: 0.35
, newport
Weight: 0.35
, norfolk
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was chosen as capital 1.00
was chosen for capital 0.99
was chosen state capital 0.97
was named capital 0.91
was chosen as capital of virginia 0.87
was chosen for capital of virginia 0.85
is capital 0.85
was chosen state capital of virginia 0.84
was chosen as state capitol 0.82
was named capital of virginia 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(city, is capital)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(city, is capital)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(city, is capital)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(springfield, was chosen as capital)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(city, is capital)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(springfield, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(springfield, was chosen as capital)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(richmond, was chosen for capital)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(richmond, was chosen state capital)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(richmond, is capital)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(richmond, was named capital)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(richmond, was chosen for capital)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(richmond, was chosen for capital)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen state capital)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(richmond, was chosen state capital)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen for capital)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(richmond, is capital)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital of virginia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(richmond, was chosen state capital)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(richmond, is capital)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(richmond, was chosen for capital of virginia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(richmond, was named capital)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(richmond, was named capital)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(richmond, was chosen state capital of virginia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(richmond, was chosen for capital of virginia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(richmond, was chosen for capital of virginia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(richmond, was chosen as state capitol)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was named capital)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital of virginia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital of virginia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen state capital of virginia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(richmond, was named capital of virginia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital of virginia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(richmond, was chosen state capital of virginia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(richmond, was chosen as state capitol)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(richmond, was chosen as state capitol)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen for capital of virginia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(richmond, was named capital of virginia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(richmond, was named capital of virginia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as state capitol)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(richmond, is capital)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(richmond, was chosen state capital of virginia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was named capital of virginia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(city, is capital)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(springfield, was chosen as capital)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(richmond, was chosen as capital)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(city, is capital)