rider: be much better than riders

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.54
, form
Weight: 0.53
, time
Weight: 0.53
, school
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tour de france
Weight: 0.59
, sprinter
Weight: 0.51
, aussies
Weight: 0.40
, jockey
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much better than riders 1.00
be much better than female riders 0.96
drop bikes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(rider, be much better than riders)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rider, be much better than female riders)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rider, be much better than female riders)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rider, be much better than female riders)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rider, be much better than female riders)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(rider, drop bikes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(rider, drop bikes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(rider, drop bikes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rider, drop bikes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rider, be much better than riders)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rider, be much better than riders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rider, be much better than riders)