riding: be good for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.57
, sport
Weight: 0.53
, exercise
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, hobby
Weight: 0.47
Siblings bicycling
Weight: 0.33
, bicycle race
Weight: 0.32
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.32
, skateboarding
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for environment 1.00
be better for environment 0.96
be for environment 0.95
be better for environment driving 0.87
be better for environment then driving 0.86
save environment 0.82
feel good 0.80
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(riding, be good for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(riding, be good for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bicycling, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(skateboarding, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(skateboarding, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(riding, be good for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(riding, be good for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(skateboarding, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skateboarding, feel good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(skateboarding, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(skateboarding, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(bicycling, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bicycling, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(riding, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(riding, be better for environment)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(riding, be for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(riding, be better for environment driving)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(riding, be for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(riding, be better for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(riding, be better for environment then driving)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(riding, save environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(riding, be better for environment driving)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(riding, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(riding, be better for environment then driving)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(riding, save environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(riding, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(riding, be for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(riding, be for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(riding, be better for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(riding, be better for environment driving)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(riding, be better for environment driving)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(riding, feel good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(riding, be better for environment then driving)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(riding, be better for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(riding, be better for environment then driving)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(riding, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(riding, save environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(riding, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(riding, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(riding, save environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(riding, feel good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(riding, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(riding, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(skateboarding, feel good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(skateboarding, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bicycling, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(riding, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)