rifle: were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.69
, small arm
Weight: 0.58
, tool
Weight: 0.57
, firearm
Weight: 0.56
Siblings assault rifle
Weight: 0.76
, machine gun
Weight: 0.69
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.68
, shotgun
Weight: 0.61
, pistol
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets 1.00
were perferable to muskets 0.91
be more expensive than rifles 0.81
be cheaper than rifles 0.80
cost more than rifles 0.80
be far cheaper than rifles 0.79
were more destructive than shot guns 0.78
be louder than rifles 0.78
be different from guns 0.78
drop ammo guns 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(firearm, drop ammo guns)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(firearm, drop ammo guns)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(firearm, drop ammo guns)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(shotgun, be more expensive than rifles)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(shotgun, be cheaper than rifles)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(shotgun, be far cheaper than rifles)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pistol, be more expensive than rifles)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, be different from guns)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pistol, be louder than rifles)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pistol, cost more than rifles)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(firearm, drop ammo guns)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(shotgun, be more expensive than rifles)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(shotgun, be more expensive than rifles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(shotgun, be cheaper than rifles)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(shotgun, be cheaper than rifles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(pistol, cost more than rifles)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pistol, cost more than rifles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(shotgun, be far cheaper than rifles)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(shotgun, be far cheaper than rifles)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(machine gun, be different from guns)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(machine gun, be different from guns)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pistol, be louder than rifles)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pistol, be louder than rifles)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pistol, be more expensive than rifles)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(pistol, be more expensive than rifles)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rifle, were perferable to muskets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were perferable to muskets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rifle, were perferable to muskets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(rifle, were perferable to muskets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(firearm, drop ammo guns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(shotgun, be more expensive than rifles)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(shotgun, be cheaper than rifles)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(shotgun, be far cheaper than rifles)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(machine gun, be different from guns)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pistol, cost more than rifles)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pistol, be louder than rifles)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pistol, be more expensive than rifles)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(machine gun, were more destructive than shot guns)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(rifle, were better weaponry than old fashioned muskets)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(firearm, drop ammo guns)