rift valley: be formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents valley
Weight: 0.74
, area
Weight: 0.61
, region
Weight: 0.55
, province
Weight: 0.49
, feature
Weight: 0.48
Siblings death valley
Weight: 0.35
, mountain range
Weight: 0.34
, lake
Weight: 0.34
, south park
Weight: 0.32
, south dakota
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be formed 1.00
is formed 0.99
were formed 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rift valley, be formed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(region, be formed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rift valley, be formed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(valley, is formed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rift valley, be formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(valley, is formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(region, be formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(valley, be formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(valley, be formed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(region, be formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(valley, is formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mountain range, be formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be formed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mountain range, is formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(region, be formed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(valley, is formed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rift valley, be formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mountain range, is formed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mountain range, is formed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(death valley, be formed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mountain range, be formed)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mountain range, be formed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lake, be formed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lake, be formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rift valley, be formed)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(rift valley, is formed)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, is formed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(rift valley, is formed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(rift valley, is formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rift valley, were formed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(rift valley, were formed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rift valley, were formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rift valley, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(valley, is formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(region, be formed)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mountain range, is formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(death valley, be formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mountain range, be formed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(lake, be formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(valley, is formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(region, be formed)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)