rift valley: were formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents valley
Weight: 0.74
, area
Weight: 0.61
, region
Weight: 0.55
, province
Weight: 0.49
, feature
Weight: 0.48
Siblings death valley
Weight: 0.35
, mountain range
Weight: 0.34
, lake
Weight: 0.34
, south park
Weight: 0.32
, south dakota
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were formed 1.00
be formed 0.95
is formed 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rift valley, were formed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(region, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rift valley, were formed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(valley, is formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rift valley, were formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(valley, is formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(region, be formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(valley, be formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(valley, be formed)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(region, be formed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(valley, is formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mountain range, be formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mountain range, is formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(rift valley, were formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(region, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(rift valley, were formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(valley, is formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(rift valley, were formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(mountain range, is formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mountain range, is formed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(death valley, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(death valley, be formed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mountain range, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(mountain range, be formed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lake, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lake, be formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rift valley, were formed)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(rift valley, is formed)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rift valley, be formed)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(rift valley, is formed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(rift valley, is formed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, is formed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rift valley, be formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rift valley, were formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(valley, is formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(region, be formed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mountain range, is formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(death valley, be formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mountain range, be formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(lake, be formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(valley, is formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(region, be formed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(rift valley, were formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)