right: were protected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents need
Weight: 0.62
, change
Weight: 0.61
, way
Weight: 0.61
, fundamental
Weight: 0.61
Siblings majority
Weight: 0.59
, left
Weight: 0.55
, sub
Weight: 0.52
, going
Weight: 0.48
, preemption
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
were protected 1.00
be protected 0.96
is protected 0.96
need protected 0.93
were protected by 23rd 24th amendments 0.83
were protected by 15th 19th 24th amendments 0.83
were protected by amendments 0.83
were protected by 19th 23rd 24th amendments 0.83
were protected by 15th 24th amendments 0.83
were protected by 15th 19th 23rd 24th amendments 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(right, were protected)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(right, is protected)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(right, be protected)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(right, were protected by 15th 19th 23rd 24th amendments)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(right, were protected by 15th 19th 23rd 24th amendments)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(right, were protected by 15th 19th 23rd 24th amendments)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(right, is protected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(right, be protected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(right, is protected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(right, be protected)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(right, be protected)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(right, is protected)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(right, were protected by 15th 19th 23rd 24th amendments)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(right, were protected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(right, were protected)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(right, were protected)