ring binder: be at stationary shop

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents binder
Weight: 0.75
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.53
Siblings briefcase
Weight: 0.32
, keepsake
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.31
, tape dispenser
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at stationary shop 1.00
be at shop 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ring binder, be at stationary shop)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ring binder, be at stationary shop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(product, be at shop)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(product, be at shop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(product, be at shop)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(product, be at shop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ring binder, be at stationary shop)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ring binder, be at stationary shop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ring binder, be at stationary shop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ring binder, be at stationary shop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ring binder, be at stationary shop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ring binder, be at stationary shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)