ring finger: be for wedding ring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents middle finger
Weight: 0.78
, finger
Weight: 0.73
, ring
Weight: 0.70
, thumb
Weight: 0.56
, nail
Weight: 0.50
Siblings wedding ring
Weight: 0.39
, index finger
Weight: 0.38
, key ring
Weight: 0.38
, pinky
Weight: 0.34
, pinkie
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for wedding ring 1.00
is wedding finger 0.84
is ring finger 0.79
is rings 0.79
be called ring finger 0.79
turn from rings 0.78
be in lord of rings 0.76
turn green from rings 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(ring, is rings)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ring finger, be for wedding ring)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(ring, is rings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(ring, is rings)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(index finger, is ring finger)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(ring, is rings)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ring finger, be for wedding ring)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(index finger, is ring finger)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(index finger, is ring finger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ring finger, be for wedding ring)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ring finger, is wedding finger)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ring finger, is wedding finger)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ring finger, is wedding finger)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(ring finger, is ring finger)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ring finger, be called ring finger)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ring finger, is ring finger)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(ring finger, is ring finger)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(ring finger, be called ring finger)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(ring finger, be called ring finger)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ring finger, is wedding finger)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ring finger, be called ring finger)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ring finger, is ring finger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ring finger, be for wedding ring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ring finger, be for wedding ring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(ring, is rings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(index finger, is ring finger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ring finger, be for wedding ring)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(ring, is rings)