ring: be at box

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gem
Weight: 0.61
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings necklace
Weight: 0.33
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.33
, bracelet
Weight: 0.32
, emerald
Weight: 0.32
, ruby
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at box 1.00
be at jewlry box 1.00
be at box gym 0.86
be at jewlery box 0.81
be at jewelery box 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(necklace, be at jewlry box)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(necklace, be at jewlery box)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(necklace, be at jewlry box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(necklace, be at jewlry box)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(necklace, be at jewlery box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(necklace, be at jewlery box)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ring, be at box)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(ring, be at box gym)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at box gym)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ring, be at box gym)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at jewelery box)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ring, be at jewelery box)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ring, be at jewelery box)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ring, be at box gym)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ring, be at jewelery box)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at box)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ring, be at box)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(necklace, be at jewlry box)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at box) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(necklace, be at jewlery box)