ring: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gem
Weight: 0.61
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings necklace
Weight: 0.33
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.33
, bracelet
Weight: 0.32
, emerald
Weight: 0.32
, ruby
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be play for recreation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(stone, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ring, be at park)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(game, be play for recreation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ring, be at park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(stone, be at park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(game, be play for recreation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(stone, be at park)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(game, be play for recreation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(stone, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ring, be at park)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(game, be play for recreation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ring, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(ring, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ring, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(stone, be at park)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(game, be play for recreation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(stone, be at park)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ring, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(game, be play for recreation)